[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <996e46e1-6776-6c87-d791-0df6f0aa58dc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 20:59:48 +0800
From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
wei.liu@...nel.org, decui@...rosoft.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
jgross@...e.com, sstabellini@...nel.org, will@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, arnd@...db.de, hch@....de,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, brijesh.singh@....com, ardb@...nel.org,
Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
martin.b.radev@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rppt@...nel.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com, krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com,
saravanand@...com, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
pgonda@...gle.com, david@...hat.com, keescook@...omium.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
michael.h.kelley@...rosoft.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, vkuznets@...hat.com, anparri@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] x86/HV: Add new hvcall guest address host
visibility support
On 8/2/2021 8:01 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 08:29:41AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> __set_memory_enc_dec() is turning into a real mess. SEV, TDX and now
>> Hyper-V are messing around in here.
>
> I was going to suggest a PV_OPS call where the fitting implementation
> for the guest environment can be plugged in at boot. There is TDX and an
> SEV(-SNP) case, a Hyper-V case, and likely more coming up from other
> cloud/hypervisor vendors. Hiding all these behind feature checks is not
> going to make things cleaner.
>
Yes, that makes sense. I will do this in the next version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists