linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 60/67] bpf: Remove superfluous aux sanitation on subprog rejection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210802134341.096900132@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  2 Aug 2021 15:45:23 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 60/67] bpf: Remove superfluous aux sanitation on subprog rejection

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>

commit 59089a189e3adde4cf85f2ce479738d1ae4c514d upstream.

Follow-up to fe9a5ca7e370 ("bpf: Do not mark insn as seen under speculative
path verification"). The sanitize_insn_aux_data() helper does not serve a
particular purpose in today's code. The original intention for the helper
was that if function-by-function verification fails, a given program would
be cleared from temporary insn_aux_data[], and then its verification would
be re-attempted in the context of the main program a second time.

However, a failure in do_check_subprogs() will skip do_check_main() and
propagate the error to the user instead, thus such situation can never occur.
Given its interaction is not compatible to the Spectre v1 mitigation (due to
comparing aux->seen with env->pass_cnt), just remove sanitize_insn_aux_data()
to avoid future bugs in this area.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c |   34 ----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 34 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -11707,37 +11707,6 @@ static void free_states(struct bpf_verif
 	}
 }
 
-/* The verifier is using insn_aux_data[] to store temporary data during
- * verification and to store information for passes that run after the
- * verification like dead code sanitization. do_check_common() for subprogram N
- * may analyze many other subprograms. sanitize_insn_aux_data() clears all
- * temporary data after do_check_common() finds that subprogram N cannot be
- * verified independently. pass_cnt counts the number of times
- * do_check_common() was run and insn->aux->seen tells the pass number
- * insn_aux_data was touched. These variables are compared to clear temporary
- * data from failed pass. For testing and experiments do_check_common() can be
- * run multiple times even when prior attempt to verify is unsuccessful.
- *
- * Note that special handling is needed on !env->bypass_spec_v1 if this is
- * ever called outside of error path with subsequent program rejection.
- */
-static void sanitize_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
-{
-	struct bpf_insn *insn = env->prog->insnsi;
-	struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux;
-	int i, class;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < env->prog->len; i++) {
-		class = BPF_CLASS(insn[i].code);
-		if (class != BPF_LDX && class != BPF_STX)
-			continue;
-		aux = &env->insn_aux_data[i];
-		if (aux->seen != env->pass_cnt)
-			continue;
-		memset(aux, 0, offsetof(typeof(*aux), orig_idx));
-	}
-}
-
 static int do_check_common(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog)
 {
 	bool pop_log = !(env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL2);
@@ -11807,9 +11776,6 @@ out:
 	if (!ret && pop_log)
 		bpf_vlog_reset(&env->log, 0);
 	free_states(env);
-	if (ret)
-		/* clean aux data in case subprog was rejected */
-		sanitize_insn_aux_data(env);
 	return ret;
 }