[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210802135446.GE28547@willie-the-truck>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 14:54:46 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Tom Murphy <murphyt7@....ie>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dma-iommu: pass SKIP_CPU_SYNC to swiotlb unmap
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 12:35:01PM +0900, David Stevens wrote:
> From: David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>
>
> If SKIP_CPU_SYNC isn't already set, then iommu_dma_unmap_(page|sg) has
> already called iommu_dma_sync_(single|sg)_for_cpu, so there is no need
> to copy from the bounce buffer again.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index e79e274d2dc5..0a9a9a343e64 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -505,7 +505,8 @@ static void __iommu_dma_unmap_swiotlb(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
> __iommu_dma_unmap(dev, dma_addr, size);
>
> if (unlikely(is_swiotlb_buffer(phys)))
> - swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
> + swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, phys, size, dir,
> + attrs | DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
> }
I think it would be cleaner to drop DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC in the callers
once they've called iommu_dma_sync_*_for_cpu().
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists