linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.13 033/104] io_uring: fix poll requests leaking second poll entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210802134345.107815242@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  2 Aug 2021 15:44:30 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Hao Xu <haoxu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 5.13 033/104] io_uring: fix poll requests leaking second poll entries

From: Hao Xu <haoxu@...ux.alibaba.com>

commit a890d01e4ee016978776e45340e521b3bbbdf41f upstream.

For pure poll requests, it doesn't remove the second poll wait entry
when it's done, neither after vfs_poll() or in the poll completion
handler. We should remove the second poll wait entry.
And we use io_poll_remove_double() rather than io_poll_remove_waitqs()
since the latter has some redundant logic.

Fixes: 88e41cf928a6 ("io_uring: add multishot mode for IORING_OP_POLL_ADD")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.13+
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <haoxu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210728030322.12307-1-haoxu@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/io_uring.c |    5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -4924,7 +4924,6 @@ static bool io_poll_complete(struct io_k
 	if (req->poll.events & EPOLLONESHOT)
 		flags = 0;
 	if (!io_cqring_fill_event(ctx, req->user_data, error, flags)) {
-		io_poll_remove_waitqs(req);
 		req->poll.done = true;
 		flags = 0;
 	}
@@ -4948,6 +4947,7 @@ static void io_poll_task_func(struct cal
 
 		done = io_poll_complete(req, req->result);
 		if (done) {
+			io_poll_remove_double(req);
 			hash_del(&req->hash_node);
 		} else {
 			req->result = 0;
@@ -5136,7 +5136,7 @@ static __poll_t __io_arm_poll_handler(st
 		ipt->error = -EINVAL;
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
-	if (ipt->error)
+	if (ipt->error || (mask && (poll->events & EPOLLONESHOT)))
 		io_poll_remove_double(req);
 	if (likely(poll->head)) {
 		spin_lock(&poll->head->lock);
@@ -5207,7 +5207,6 @@ static bool io_arm_poll_handler(struct i
 	ret = __io_arm_poll_handler(req, &apoll->poll, &ipt, mask,
 					io_async_wake);
 	if (ret || ipt.error) {
-		io_poll_remove_double(req);
 		spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
 		return false;
 	}