[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210802151833.15348-1-broonie@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 16:18:33 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
between commit:
0f9ed3b2c9ec ("drm/i915/display/cnl+: Handle fused off DSC")
from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit:
a4d082fc194a ("drm/i915: rename/remove CNL registers")
from the drm-intel tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
index e0a10f36acc1,305facedd284..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
Powered by blists - more mailing lists