[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YQjQlG907psQo/iB@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 07:13:56 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>
Cc: Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: class: usblp: replace conditional statement with
min()
On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 08:50:22PM -0500, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 01:28:06 +0100
> Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Replace conditional statement with min() in order to make code cleaner. Issue
> > found by coccinelle.
>
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/class/usblp.c
> > request, !!dir, recip, value, index, len, retval);
> > - return retval < 0 ? retval : 0;
> > + return min(retval, 0);
> > }
>
> I'm very much against this change. The function min() is there
> for numeric values. But here we have a situation where we
> do one thing if there was an error, and another thing if
> there was no error.
>
> This sort of abuse is exactly why blindly clicking heels
> whenever a tool tells you is not optimal.
>
> If the objective is to shut the tool up, please consider
> the following instead:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/class/usblp.c b/drivers/usb/class/usblp.c
> index 9596e4279294..bbcbcf199fa9 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/class/usblp.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/class/usblp.c
> @@ -264,7 +264,9 @@ static int usblp_ctrl_msg(struct usblp *usblp, int request, int type, int dir, i
> dev_dbg(&usblp->intf->dev,
> "usblp_control_msg: rq: 0x%02x dir: %d recip: %d value: %d idx: %d len: %#x result: %d\n",
> request, !!dir, recip, value, index, len, retval);
> - return retval < 0 ? retval : 0;
> + if (retval < 0)
> + return retval;
> + return 0;
> }
I agree with Pete here, this is the "correct" fix for this, using min()
is not ok here.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists