Message-ID: <CAD-N9QVfreHCV7673DVq6aS3+3RYQ4-x8eZuGF0pvUbRhTL-Cg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Aug 2021 14:06:43 +0800
From:   Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
To:     Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
Cc:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        Xiang Chen <chenxiang66@...ilicon.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        Corentin Labbe <clabbe@...libre.com>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: sun8i-ce: fix multiple memory leaks in sun8i_ce_hash_run

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 1:57 PM Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 2:25 AM Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Le Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:27:12PM +0800, Dongliang Mu a écrit :
> > > In sun8i_ce_hash_run, all the dma_mmap_sg/single will cause memory leak
> > > due to no corresponding unmap operation if errors happen.
> > >
> > > Fix this by adding error handling part for all the dma_mmap_sg/single.
> > >
> >
> > I think it could be better worded, error handling is already there (but bad).
>
> Sure. How about "Fix this by freeing the objects allocated by
> dma_mmap_sg/single when errors occur."?
>
> >
> > > Fixes: 56f6d5aee88d ("crypto: sun8i-ce - support hash algorithms")
> > > Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >  .../crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-hash.c | 28 +++++++++----------
> > >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-hash.c b/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-hash.c
> > > index 88194718a806..d454ad99deee 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-hash.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-hash.c
> > > @@ -286,16 +286,14 @@ int sun8i_ce_hash_run(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *breq)
> > >
> > >       /* the padding could be up to two block. */
> > >       buf = kzalloc(bs * 2, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
> > > -     if (!buf) {
> > > -             err = -ENOMEM;
> > > -             goto theend;
> >
> > Please keep all goto error for being consistent.
>
> OK, no problem.
>
> BTW, usually for the 1st malloc failure, I prefer returning with errno directly.

For this case, as crypto_finalize_hash_request must be executed, so
directly return is incorrect. I will add a goto label before
crypto_finalize_hash_request.

>
> >
> > > -     }
> > > +     if (!buf)
> > > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > >       bf = (__le32 *)buf;
> > >
> > >       result = kzalloc(digestsize, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
> > >       if (!result) {
> > > -             err = -ENOMEM;
> > > -             goto theend;
> > > +             kfree(buf);
> > > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > >       }
> > >
> > >       flow = rctx->flow;
> > > @@ -321,7 +319,7 @@ int sun8i_ce_hash_run(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *breq)
> > >       if (nr_sgs <= 0 || nr_sgs > MAX_SG) {
> > >               dev_err(ce->dev, "Invalid sg number %d\n", nr_sgs);
> > >               err = -EINVAL;
> > > -             goto theend;
> > > +             goto err_result;
> > >       }
> > >
> > >       len = areq->nbytes;
> > > @@ -334,7 +332,7 @@ int sun8i_ce_hash_run(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *breq)
> > >       if (len > 0) {
> > >               dev_err(ce->dev, "remaining len %d\n", len);
> > >               err = -EINVAL;
> > > -             goto theend;
> > > +             goto err_unmap_sg;
> > >       }
> > >       addr_res = dma_map_single(ce->dev, result, digestsize, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> > >       cet->t_dst[0].addr = cpu_to_le32(addr_res);
> > > @@ -342,7 +340,7 @@ int sun8i_ce_hash_run(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *breq)
> > >       if (dma_mapping_error(ce->dev, addr_res)) {
> > >               dev_err(ce->dev, "DMA map dest\n");
> > >               err = -EINVAL;
> > > -             goto theend;
> > > +             goto err_unmap_sg;
> > >       }
> > >
> > >       byte_count = areq->nbytes;
> > > @@ -392,7 +390,7 @@ int sun8i_ce_hash_run(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *breq)
> > >       if (dma_mapping_error(ce->dev, addr_pad)) {
> > >               dev_err(ce->dev, "DMA error on padding SG\n");
> > >               err = -EINVAL;
> > > -             goto theend;
> > > +             goto err_addr_res;
> > >       }
> > >
> > >       if (ce->variant->hash_t_dlen_in_bits)
> > > @@ -405,15 +403,15 @@ int sun8i_ce_hash_run(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *breq)
> > >       err = sun8i_ce_run_task(ce, flow, crypto_tfm_alg_name(areq->base.tfm));
> > >
> > >       dma_unmap_single(ce->dev, addr_pad, j * 4, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > > +err_addr_res:
> > > +     dma_unmap_single(ce->dev, addr_res, digestsize, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> > > +err_unmap_sg:
> > >       dma_unmap_sg(ce->dev, areq->src, sg_nents(areq->src),
> > >                    DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > > -     dma_unmap_single(ce->dev, addr_res, digestsize, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> > > -
> > > -
> > >       memcpy(areq->result, result, algt->alg.hash.halg.digestsize);
> >
> > The result should be copied only when everything is ok. Please add a "if (!err)"
>
> Sure.
>
> >
> > Thanks for your work
> > Regards

Powered by blists - more mailing lists