[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YQkBfal/OiI2y1lA@osiris>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 10:42:37 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
frankja@...ux.ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com, david@...hat.com,
thuth@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] s390x: optimization of the check for CPU topology
change
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 10:26:46AM +0200, Pierre Morel wrote:
> Now that the PTF instruction is interpreted by the SIE we can optimize
> the arch_update_cpu_topology callback to check if there is a real need
> to update the topology by using the PTF instruction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kernel/topology.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c b/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
> index 26aa2614ee35..741cb447e78e 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -322,6 +322,9 @@ int arch_update_cpu_topology(void)
> struct device *dev;
> int cpu, rc;
>
> + if (!ptf(PTF_CHECK))
> + return 0;
> +
We have a timer which checks if topology changed and then triggers a
call to arch_update_cpu_topology() via rebuild_sched_domains().
With this change topology changes would get lost.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists