[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210803102808.GA8641@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 12:28:08 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 58/63] futex: Prevent requeue_pi() lock nesting issue on
RT
On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 02:56:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> static inline void futex_requeue_pi_complete(struct futex_q *q, int locked)
> {
> + int old, new;
>
> + old = atomic_read_acquire(&q->requeue_state);
> + do {
if (old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE)
return;
> if (locked >= 0) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(old != Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS &&
old != Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT)
> /* Requeue succeeded. Set DONE or LOCKED */
> new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE + locked;
> + } else if (old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS) {
> /* Deadlock, no early wakeup interleave */
> new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE;
> } else {
WARN_ON_ONCE(old != Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT);
> /* Deadlock, early wakeup interleave. */
> new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE;
> }
> + } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&q->requeue_state, &old, new));
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> /* If the waiter interleaved with the requeue let it know */
> + if (unlikely(old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT))
> rcuwait_wake_up(&q->requeue_wait);
> #endif
> }
I think...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists