| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 10:19:35 +0800
From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: 0day robot <lkp@...el.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+5d1bad8042a8f0e8117a@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com,
zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Subject: [crypto] ed610fb786: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops 4.6% improvement
Greeting,
FYI, we noticed a 4.6% improvement of will-it-scale.per_thread_ops due to commit:
commit: ed610fb7867eff838da286444016ae58fa4f86b2 ("[PATCH] crypto: x86/aes-ni - add missing error checks in XTS code")
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Ard-Biesheuvel/crypto-x86-aes-ni-add-missing-error-checks-in-XTS-code/20210718-100125
base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/herbert/cryptodev-2.6.git master
in testcase: will-it-scale
on test machine: 88 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6238M CPU @ 2.10GHz with 128G memory
with following parameters:
nr_task: 100%
mode: thread
test: getppid1
cpufreq_governor: performance
ucode: 0x5003006
test-description: Will It Scale takes a testcase and runs it from 1 through to n parallel copies to see if the testcase will scale. It builds both a process and threads based test in order to see any differences between the two.
test-url: https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale
Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
To reproduce:
git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
cd lkp-tests
bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email
bin/lkp split-job --compatible job.yaml # generate the yaml file for lkp run
bin/lkp run generated-yaml-file
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/mode/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase/ucode:
gcc-9/performance/x86_64-rhel-8.3/thread/100%/debian-10.4-x86_64-20200603.cgz/lkp-csl-2sp9/getppid1/will-it-scale/0x5003006
commit:
66192b2e3f ("crypto: hisilicon/sec - fix the process of disabling sva prefetching")
ed610fb786 ("crypto: x86/aes-ni - add missing error checks in XTS code")
66192b2e3fd8ab97 ed610fb7867eff838da28644401
---------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
7.27e+08 +4.6% 7.601e+08 will-it-scale.88.threads
8261617 +4.6% 8637651 will-it-scale.per_thread_ops
7.27e+08 +4.6% 7.601e+08 will-it-scale.workload
2267 ± 19% -19.8% 1818 ± 16% interrupts.CPU33.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
425.50 ± 26% -21.0% 336.29 ± 9% interrupts.CPU37.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
622.50 ± 53% -43.9% 349.43 ± 20% interrupts.CPU63.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
6505 ± 28% -14.7% 5546 ± 34% interrupts.CPU75.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
6505 ± 28% -14.7% 5546 ± 34% interrupts.CPU75.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
829.33 ± 54% -56.0% 365.29 ± 27% interrupts.CPU77.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
2423 ± 3% -21.5% 1903 ± 42% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.do_syslog.part.0.kmsg_read.vfs_read
7265 ± 3% -21.5% 5706 ± 42% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.do_syslog.part.0.kmsg_read.vfs_read
23.15 ± 26% +4566.5% 1080 ±237% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.exit_to_user_mode_prepare.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
6202 ± 8% -17.1% 5139 ± 10% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.smpboot_thread_fn.kthread.ret_from_fork
2421 ± 3% -21.4% 1903 ± 42% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.do_syslog.part.0.kmsg_read.vfs_read
0.16 ± 11% -17.4% 0.13 ± 19% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.exit_to_user_mode_prepare.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown]
7261 ± 3% -21.4% 5705 ± 42% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.do_syslog.part.0.kmsg_read.vfs_read
22.98 ± 27% +4602.1% 1080 ±237% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.exit_to_user_mode_prepare.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
6201 ± 8% -17.1% 5139 ± 10% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.smpboot_thread_fn.kthread.ret_from_fork
3.779e+10 +4.6% 3.954e+10 perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
0.49 -0.0 0.47 perf-stat.i.branch-miss-rate%
434873 ± 2% +10.3% 479520 ± 4% perf-stat.i.cache-misses
1.38 -4.5% 1.31 perf-stat.i.cpi
741687 ± 2% -12.1% 652145 ± 6% perf-stat.i.cycles-between-cache-misses
6.022e+10 +4.6% 6.299e+10 perf-stat.i.dTLB-loads
0.00 -0.0 0.00 perf-stat.i.dTLB-store-miss-rate%
149137 -1.6% 146697 perf-stat.i.dTLB-store-misses
4.21e+10 +4.5% 4.401e+10 perf-stat.i.dTLB-stores
2.354e+08 ± 2% -4.9% 2.238e+08 perf-stat.i.iTLB-load-misses
1.759e+11 +4.6% 1.841e+11 perf-stat.i.instructions
755.18 ± 2% +9.5% 826.97 perf-stat.i.instructions-per-iTLB-miss
0.73 +4.7% 0.76 perf-stat.i.ipc
1592 +4.6% 1665 perf-stat.i.metric.M/sec
0.49 -0.0 0.47 perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate%
1.38 -4.5% 1.32 perf-stat.overall.cpi
549393 ± 2% -9.0% 500080 ± 4% perf-stat.overall.cycles-between-cache-misses
0.00 -0.0 0.00 perf-stat.overall.dTLB-store-miss-rate%
748.01 ± 2% +10.0% 822.71 perf-stat.overall.instructions-per-iTLB-miss
0.73 +4.7% 0.76 perf-stat.overall.ipc
3.767e+10 +4.6% 3.941e+10 perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions
439954 ± 2% +9.9% 483612 ± 4% perf-stat.ps.cache-misses
6.002e+10 +4.6% 6.278e+10 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-loads
148856 -1.6% 146461 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-store-misses
4.196e+10 +4.5% 4.386e+10 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-stores
2.346e+08 ± 2% -4.9% 2.231e+08 perf-stat.ps.iTLB-load-misses
1.754e+11 +4.6% 1.835e+11 perf-stat.ps.instructions
5.289e+13 +4.6% 5.534e+13 perf-stat.total.instructions
13.13 -2.6 10.51 ± 3% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.getppid
32.70 -2.4 30.28 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.getppid
40.62 -2.4 38.22 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.getppid
9.17 -1.6 7.55 ± 4% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.exit_to_user_mode_prepare.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.getppid
2.42 ± 2% -0.9 1.50 ± 3% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.getppid
94.55 -0.3 94.26 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.getppid
3.00 +0.1 3.12 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_safe_stack.getppid
2.98 +0.2 3.20 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.syscall_enter_from_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.getppid
8.91 +0.5 9.37 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.testcase
42.46 +2.1 44.56 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__entry_text_start.getppid
14.20 -2.6 11.64 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.syscall_exit_to_user_mode
33.60 -2.4 31.19 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64
41.30 -2.3 38.96 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
9.50 -1.6 7.92 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.exit_to_user_mode_prepare
2.60 ± 2% -0.8 1.81 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare
1.21 -0.1 1.07 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.rcu_read_unlock_strict
3.20 +0.1 3.34 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_safe_stack
3.06 +0.2 3.28 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.syscall_enter_from_user_mode
5.28 +0.2 5.52 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.testcase
22.43 +0.7 23.10 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.syscall_return_via_sysret
27.43 +1.3 28.77 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__entry_text_start
8.32 -1.5 6.81 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.exit_to_user_mode_prepare
2.24 ± 3% -0.8 1.43 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare
3.90 -0.2 3.69 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_getppid
0.87 -0.1 0.73 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.rcu_read_unlock_strict
2.43 -0.1 2.31 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.syscall_exit_to_user_mode
0.81 ± 3% -0.1 0.72 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.rcu_nocb_flush_deferred_wakeup
7.82 +0.1 7.90 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
3.17 +0.1 3.31 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_safe_stack
2.36 +0.2 2.55 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.syscall_enter_from_user_mode
12.36 +0.6 12.96 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__entry_text_start
22.14 +0.6 22.77 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.syscall_return_via_sysret
19.17 +1.0 20.14 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.getppid
will-it-scale.per_thread_ops
8.8e+06 +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| O O OO O |
8.7e+06 |O+O O O |
| O O |
| OO O OO OOOO OOO |
8.6e+06 |-+ |
| O |
8.5e+06 |-+ |
|+.++ +.++++.+ |
8.4e+06 |-+ + .++ ++. : : |
| +.++++ +.++ +++ : |
| : |
8.3e+06 |-+ : + .+ + +. + |
| + .+ :+ + +.++ ++++.++++.+ ++.+|
8.2e+06 +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
[*] bisect-good sample
[O] bisect-bad sample
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
---
0DAY/LKP+ Test Infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/lkp@lists.01.org Intel Corporation
Thanks,
Oliver Sang
View attachment "config-5.13.0-rc1-00150-ged610fb7867e" of type "text/plain" (173972 bytes)
View attachment "job-script" of type "text/plain" (8115 bytes)
View attachment "job.yaml" of type "text/plain" (5352 bytes)
View attachment "reproduce" of type "text/plain" (339 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists