[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210803105937.52052-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 12:59:35 +0200
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Jia He <hejianet@...il.com>,
Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Fix /proc/sys/fs/nfs/nsm_use_hostnames on big endian machines
There is an endianess problem with /proc/sys/fs/nfs/nsm_use_hostnames
(which can e.g. be seen on an s390x host) :
# modprobe lockd nsm_use_hostnames=1
# cat /proc/sys/fs/nfs/nsm_use_hostnames
16777216
The nsm_use_hostnames variable is declared as "bool" which is required
for the correct type for the module parameter. However, this does not
work correctly with the entry in the /proc filesystem since this
currently requires "int".
Jia He already provided patches for this problem a couple of years ago,
but apparently they felt through the cracks and never got merged. So
here's a rebased version to finally fix this issue.
Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764075
Jia He (2):
sysctl: introduce new proc handler proc_dobool
lockd: change the proc_handler for nsm_use_hostnames
fs/lockd/svc.c | 2 +-
include/linux/sysctl.h | 2 ++
kernel/sysctl.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists