[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YQkqMhGsra8YCVoU@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 12:36:18 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shuang Zhai <zhais@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: don't remap clean subpages when splitting
isolated thp
On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 12:39:38AM -0600, Yu Zhao wrote:
> +++ b/include/linux/rmap.h
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ int page_mkclean(struct page *);
> */
> void page_mlock(struct page *page);
>
> -void remove_migration_ptes(struct page *old, struct page *new, bool locked);
> +void remove_migration_ptes(struct page *old, struct page *new, bool locked, bool unmap_clean);
I'm not a big fan of 'bool, bool'. Could we use a flag word instead?
#define MIGRATE_REMOVE_LOCKED 1
#define MIGRATE_UNMAP_CLEAN 2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists