lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 3 Aug 2021 09:38:57 -0500
From:   Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     brijesh.singh@....com, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, tony.luck@...el.com,
        npmccallum@...hat.com, brijesh.ksingh@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 20/40] KVM: SVM: Make AVIC backing, VMSA and
 VMCB memory allocation SNP safe

Hi Sean,


On 7/20/21 1:02 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> IMO, the CPU behavior is a bug, even if the behavior is working as intended for
> the microarchitecture.  I.e. this should be treated as an erratum.
> 

I agreed with your comment that it should be treated as an erratum. I 
now have agreement from the hardware team to publish this as an erratum 
with explanation and recommendation. This will certainly help in 
documenting on "why" we are making the page split.

...

>>   
>> -	apic->regs = (void *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
>> +	if (kvm_x86_ops.alloc_apic_backing_page)
>> +		apic->regs = kvm_x86_ops.alloc_apic_backing_page(vcpu);
> 
> This can be a static_call().

Noted.

> 
> This isn't "finding" anything, it's identifying which of the two pages is
> _guaranteed_ to be unaligned.  The whole function needs a much bigger comment to
> explain what's going on.

Let me add more comment to clarify it.

> 
>> +	pfn = page_to_pfn(p);
>> +	if (IS_ALIGNED(__pfn_to_phys(pfn), PMD_SIZE)) {
>> +		pfn++;
>> +		__free_page(p);
>> +	} else {
>> +		__free_page(pfn_to_page(pfn + 1));
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return pfn_to_page(pfn);
>> +}

thanks

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ