[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YQljw+wozb9vIGnU@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 16:41:55 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@...il.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pali@...nel.org, dsterba@...e.cz,
aaptel@...e.com, rdunlap@...radead.org, joe@...ches.com,
mark@...mstone.com, nborisov@...e.com,
linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net, anton@...era.com, hch@....de,
ebiggers@...nel.org, andy.lavr@...il.com, oleksandr@...alenko.name
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restyle comments to better align with kernel-doc
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 06:26:19PM +0300, Kari Argillander wrote:
> I would not even try to make these kind of changes if ntfs3 patch series
> was already merged to kernel. But probably I will try to bring kernel doc
> style funtion comments in future when ntfs3 gets merged.
There's very little value to adding kernel-doc comments to individual
filesystems. Filesystems don't usually provide services to the rest of
the kernel. It's a much better use of your time to write kernel-doc
comments for functions and structures in the VFS and MM that are used
by many filesystems and device drivers.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists