[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3530714d-125b-e0f5-45b2-72695e2fc4ee@uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 18:04:57 -0400
From: Thierry Delisle <tdelisle@...terloo.ca>
To: <posk@...k.io>
CC: <avagin@...gle.com>, <bsegall@...gle.com>, <jannh@...gle.com>,
<linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<mingo@...hat.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <pjt@...gle.com>,
<posk@...gle.com>, <tdelisle@...terloo.ca>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Buhr <pabuhr@...terloo.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4 v0.4] sched/umcg: RFC: implement UMCG syscalls
I have attached an atomic stack implementation I wrote. I believe it would
be applicable here. It is very similar except the kernel side no longer
needs a retry loop, the looping is moved to the user-space after the pop.
Using it instead of the code you have in enqueue_idle_worker means the
timeout is no longer needed.
> - ``uint64_t idle_server_tid_ptr``: points to a pointer variable in the
> userspace that points to an idle server, i.e. a server in IDLE
state waiting
> in sys_umcg_wait(); read-only; workers must have this field set;
not used
> in servers.
>
> When a worker's blocking operation in the kernel completes, the kernel
> changes the worker's state from ``BLOCKED`` to ``IDLE``, adds the
worker
> to the list of idle workers, and checks whether
> ``*idle_server_tid_ptr`` is not zero. If not, the kernel tries to
cmpxchg()
> it with zero; if cmpxchg() succeeds, the kernel will then wake the
server.
> See `State transitions`_ below for more details.
In this case, I believe cmpxchg is not necessary and xchg suffices.
View attachment "atomic_stack.c" of type "text/x-csrc" (3151 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists