lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 4 Aug 2021 13:03:01 +0800
From:   Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
CC:     <wangliang101@...wei.com>, <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        <wangle6@...wei.com>, <kepler.chenxin@...wei.com>,
        <nixiaoming@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lib: Use PFN_PHYS() in devmem_is_allowed()


On 2021/8/4 8:20, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:04:05 PDT (-0700), wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com 
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2021/7/30 14:49, Liang Wang wrote:
>>> The physical address may exceed 32 bits on ARM(when ARM_LPAE enabled),
>>> use PFN_PHYS() in devmem_is_allowed(), or the physical address may
>>> overflow and be truncated.
>>>
>>> This bug was initially introduced from v2.6.37, and the function was 
>>> moved
>>> to lib when v5.10.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 087aaffcdf9c ("ARM: implement CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM by 
>>> disabling access to RAM via /dev/mem")
>>> Fixes: 527701eda5f1 ("lib: Add a generic version of 
>>> devmem_is_allowed()")
>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v2.6.37
>>> Signed-off-by: Liang Wang <wangliang101@...wei.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>> v2: update subject and changelog
>>>   lib/devmem_is_allowed.c | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
...
> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
>
> I only see the reply so I'm assuming this is going in through some 
> other tree, but LMK if you want it via the RISC-V tree as IIRC we're 
> using it too.

Hi Palmer,  there is a v3 with changelog updated,

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210731025057.78825-1-wangliang101@huawei.com/


>
> Thanks!
> .
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ