[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VczUTTN3f=fv5d_kRa+OP=MMhJTSVfSu-t2PURTGkycfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 10:29:54 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: LED subsystem lagging maintenance
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 12:58 AM Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> > >> I have noticed that in the last couple of cycles the LED subsystem is
> > >> a bit laggish in terms of maintenance (*). I think it's time that
> > >> someone can help Pavel to sort things out.
> > >>
> > >> In any case, I wonder if we have any kind of procedure for what to do
> > >> in such cases. Do we need to assume that the subsystem is in a
> > >> (pre-)orphaned state? If so, who is the best to take care of patch
> > >> flow?
> > >
> > > To be honest, patches were not applied because they were not that
> > > important to begin with, because of lacking explanation, and because
> > > you pushed a bit too hard.
> > >
> > > Yes, I'm quite busy in -rc1 to -rc3 timeframe with stable reviews. No,
> > > LED subsystem is not orphaned.
> >
> > It is good to hear that you are still actively maintaining the LED
> > subsystem, thank you.
> >
> > This thread does remind me that I was planning on re-sending this
> > LED patch which seems to have fallen through the cracks:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/alsa-devel/20210221115208.105203-1-hdegoede@redhat.com/
> >
> > Can you pick this one up please? Or shall I resend it?
>
> Thanks, applied.
Thank you, Pavel! Sorry for being a bit pushy.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists