linux-kernel - [Resend v3] drm/msm/disp/dpu1: add safe lut config in dpu driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1628066313-9717-1-git-send-email-kalyan_t@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed,  4 Aug 2021 01:38:33 -0700
From:   Kalyan Thota <kalyan_t@...eaurora.org>
To:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Kalyan Thota <kalyan_t@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robdclark@...il.com,
        dianders@...omium.org, mkrishn@...eaurora.org,
        saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Resend v3] drm/msm/disp/dpu1: add safe lut config in dpu driver

Add safe lut configuration for all the targets in dpu
driver as per QOS recommendation.

Issue reported on SC7280:

With wait-for-safe feature in smmu enabled, RT client
buffer levels are checked to be safe before smmu invalidation.
Since display was always set to unsafe it was delaying the
invalidaiton process thus impacting the performance on NRT clients
such as eMMC and NVMe.

Validated this change on SC7280, With this change eMMC performance
has improved significantly.

Changes in v2:
- Add fixes tag (Sai)
- CC stable kernel (Dimtry)

Changes in v3:
- Correct fixes tag with appropriate hash (stephen)
- Resend patch adding reviewed by tag

Fixes: 591e34a091d1 ("drm/msm/disp/dpu1: add support for display for SC7280 target")
Signed-off-by: Kalyan Thota <kalyan_t@...eaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org> (sc7280, sc7180)
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
index d01c4c9..2e482cd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
@@ -974,6 +974,7 @@ static const struct dpu_perf_cfg sdm845_perf_data = {
 	.amortizable_threshold = 25,
 	.min_prefill_lines = 24,
 	.danger_lut_tbl = {0xf, 0xffff, 0x0},
+	.safe_lut_tbl = {0xfff0, 0xf000, 0xffff},
 	.qos_lut_tbl = {
 		{.nentry = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_qos_linear),
 		.entries = sdm845_qos_linear
@@ -1001,6 +1002,7 @@ static const struct dpu_perf_cfg sc7180_perf_data = {
 	.min_dram_ib = 1600000,
 	.min_prefill_lines = 24,
 	.danger_lut_tbl = {0xff, 0xffff, 0x0},
+	.safe_lut_tbl = {0xfff0, 0xff00, 0xffff},
 	.qos_lut_tbl = {
 		{.nentry = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7180_qos_linear),
 		.entries = sc7180_qos_linear
@@ -1028,6 +1030,7 @@ static const struct dpu_perf_cfg sm8150_perf_data = {
 	.min_dram_ib = 800000,
 	.min_prefill_lines = 24,
 	.danger_lut_tbl = {0xf, 0xffff, 0x0},
+	.safe_lut_tbl = {0xfff8, 0xf000, 0xffff},
 	.qos_lut_tbl = {
 		{.nentry = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8150_qos_linear),
 		.entries = sm8150_qos_linear
@@ -1056,6 +1059,7 @@ static const struct dpu_perf_cfg sm8250_perf_data = {
 	.min_dram_ib = 800000,
 	.min_prefill_lines = 35,
 	.danger_lut_tbl = {0xf, 0xffff, 0x0},
+	.safe_lut_tbl = {0xfff0, 0xff00, 0xffff},
 	.qos_lut_tbl = {
 		{.nentry = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7180_qos_linear),
 		.entries = sc7180_qos_linear
@@ -1084,6 +1088,7 @@ static const struct dpu_perf_cfg sc7280_perf_data = {
 	.min_dram_ib = 1600000,
 	.min_prefill_lines = 24,
 	.danger_lut_tbl = {0xffff, 0xffff, 0x0},
+	.safe_lut_tbl = {0xff00, 0xff00, 0xffff},
 	.qos_lut_tbl = {
 		{.nentry = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7180_qos_macrotile),
 		.entries = sc7180_qos_macrotile
-- 
2.7.4