[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiSwzrWOSN5UCrej3YcLRPmW5tViGSA5p2m-hiyKnQiMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 17:10:22 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"Leonidas P. Papadakos" <papadakospan@...il.com>,
Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>,
zajec5@...il.com, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] vboxsf fixes for 5.14-1
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 5:04 PM Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>
> TBH, I had forgotten that we had an in-kernel ntfs implementation.
Well, that's the one we are comparing to, so forgetting it is a bit of
an oversight.
> Whenver I've ever needed to access ntfs files, I've always used the
> ntfs-3g FUSE package.
The user-space FUSE thing does indeed work reasonably well.
It performs horribly badly if you care about things like that, though.
In fact, your own numbers kind of show that:
ntfs/default: 670 tests, 55 failures, 211 skipped, 34783 seconds
ntfs3/default: 664 tests, 67 failures, 206 skipped, 8106 seconds
and that's kind of the point of ntfs3.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists