[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFoCABbyKaejhzAqM9hv7Emg4WyfbtORoW_XMnmoxKSVAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 13:34:44 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@...s.st.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: mmci: stm32: check when the voltage switch procedure
should be done
On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 at 16:34, Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@...s.st.com> wrote:
>
> From: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>
>
> If the card has not been power cycled, it may still be using 1.8V
> signaling. This situation is detected in mmc_sd_init_card function and
> should be handled in mmci stm32 variant.
> The host->pwr_reg variable is also correctly protected with spin locks.
>
> Fixes: 94b94a93e355 ("mmc: mmci_sdmmc: Implement signal voltage callbacks")
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@...s.st.com>
Applied for fixes and by adding stable tag, thanks!
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/mmci_stm32_sdmmc.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci_stm32_sdmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci_stm32_sdmmc.c
> index 51db30acf4dc..fdaa11f92fe6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci_stm32_sdmmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci_stm32_sdmmc.c
> @@ -479,8 +479,9 @@ static int sdmmc_post_sig_volt_switch(struct mmci_host *host,
> u32 status;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (ios->signal_voltage == MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180) {
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> + if (ios->signal_voltage == MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180 &&
> + host->pwr_reg & MCI_STM32_VSWITCHEN) {
> mmci_write_pwrreg(host, host->pwr_reg | MCI_STM32_VSWITCH);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>
> @@ -492,9 +493,11 @@ static int sdmmc_post_sig_volt_switch(struct mmci_host *host,
>
> writel_relaxed(MCI_STM32_VSWENDC | MCI_STM32_CKSTOPC,
> host->base + MMCICLEAR);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> mmci_write_pwrreg(host, host->pwr_reg &
> ~(MCI_STM32_VSWITCHEN | MCI_STM32_VSWITCH));
> }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists