linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.14-rc4-rt4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210804162001.resdas32c6oy75o3@linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 4 Aug 2021 18:20:01 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.14-rc4-rt4

On 2021-08-04 10:05:39 [-0600], Jens Axboe wrote:
> So what do you propose in the interim? As far as io_uring is concerned,
> it's not a _huge_ deal to do the IRQ dance, but it does bother me that
> we're making things slightly worse for the mainline kernel just to make
> the out-of-tree patches happy.

I'm sorry but I propose nothing other than the dance. I don't think
PeterZ/ tglx will appreciate the ifdefery to avoid the IRQ-on/off here.
I have no other ideas here.

Sebastian