linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: set poll_limit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hV-3KXJM0WiQ=5nLoO06-A5ky_E7FViokj9uDax8zg1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Aug 2021 19:22:39 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@...il.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@...os.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: set poll_limit_ns out of if-else

On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 8:28 PM Pankaj Gupta
<pankaj.gupta.linux@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@...os.com>
>
>  Since poll_limit_ns is being set at the end of both if and else statement.

But they are if () and else if (), so not really.

>  Moving and setting it out at one place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@...os.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c
> index cb2a96eafc02..7d0e95bc94f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c
> @@ -90,7 +90,6 @@ static void adjust_poll_limit(struct cpuidle_device *dev, u64 block_ns)
>                 if (val > guest_halt_poll_ns)
>                         val = guest_halt_poll_ns;
>
> -               dev->poll_limit_ns = val;
>         } else if (block_ns > guest_halt_poll_ns &&
>                    guest_halt_poll_allow_shrink) {
>                 unsigned int shrink = guest_halt_poll_shrink;
> @@ -100,8 +99,9 @@ static void adjust_poll_limit(struct cpuidle_device *dev, u64 block_ns)
>                         val = 0;
>                 else
>                         val /= shrink;
> -               dev->poll_limit_ns = val;
>         }
> +
> +       dev->poll_limit_ns = val;
>  }
>
>  /**
> --
> 2.25.1
>