[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f641fd9b-56c7-ddef-45d8-36ba340b9ab9@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 12:06:57 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...abs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] fs/epoll: use a per-cpu counter for user's watches
count
On 8/4/21 8:22 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 01:20:13PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> This counter tracks the number of watches a user has, to compare against
>> the 'max_user_watches' limit. This causes a scalability bottleneck on
>> SPECjbb2015 on large systems as there is only one user. Changing to a
>> per-cpu counter increases throughput of the benchmark by about 30% on a
>> 16-socket, > 1000 thread system.
>>
>> Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@...abs.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
>
> With all tinyconfig builds (and all other builds with CONFIG_EPOLL=n),
> this patch results in:
>
> kernel/user.c: In function 'free_user':
> kernel/user.c:141:35: error: 'struct user_struct' has no member named 'epoll_watches'
> 141 | percpu_counter_destroy(&up->epoll_watches);
> | ^~
> kernel/user.c: In function 'alloc_uid':
> kernel/user.c:189:45: error: 'struct user_struct' has no member named 'epoll_watches'
> 189 | if (percpu_counter_init(&new->epoll_watches, 0, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> | ^~
> kernel/user.c:203:52: error: 'struct user_struct' has no member named 'epoll_watches'
> 203 | percpu_counter_destroy(&new->epoll_watches);
> | ^~
> kernel/user.c: In function 'uid_cache_init':
> kernel/user.c:225:43: error: 'struct user_struct' has no member named 'epoll_watches'
> 225 | if (percpu_counter_init(&root_user.epoll_watches, 0, GFP_KERNEL))
> | ^
>
> Guenter
>
Hi,
Nick and I have also posted patches for this.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1628051945.fens3r99ox.astroid@bobo.none/
thanks.--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists