[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <515ff3e6-d7aa-4d40-1cf7-7113721d68b9@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 12:27:44 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] driver: base: Add driver filter support
On 8/4/2021 11:29 AM, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>
>
> On 8/4/21 11:08 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> Why use a doubly-linked-list here? An allocating xarray should perform
>> much better and use less memory.
>
> We don't expect the list to be too long. So we may not gain any
> significant
> advantage in terms of performance or memory when using alternate
> lists. Since
> linked list easier to use, we chose it.
>
Also even if it was long it wouldn't matter because this isn't a fast
path at all.
All that matters it to write the code as clearly as possible.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists