[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <710fff58-1db3-d0c2-21db-b1837d37bfee@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 15:37:35 -0400
From: Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 15/63] locking: Add base code for RT rw_semaphore and
rwlock
On 7/30/21 9:50 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> +static int __sched rwbase_write_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
> + unsigned int state)
> +{
> + struct rt_mutex_base *rtm = &rwb->rtmutex;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + /* Take the rtmutex as a first step */
> + if (rwbase_rtmutex_lock_state(rtm, state))
This function is used here before it was defined in next patch (patch 16).
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists