linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/vmstat: Protect per cpu variables with preempt disable on RT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 5 Aug 2021 16:22:06 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux-RT-Users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/vmstat: Protect per cpu variables with preempt
 disable on RT

On Thu,  5 Aug 2021 17:00:19 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net> wrote:

> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> 
> Disable preemption on -RT for the vmstat code. On vanila the code runs
> in IRQ-off regions while on -RT it may not when stats are updated under
> a local_lock. "preempt_disable" ensures that the same resources is not
> updated in parallel due to preemption.
> 
> This patch differs from the preempt-rt version where __count_vm_event and
> __count_vm_events are also protected. The counters are explicitly "allowed
> to be to be racy" so there is no need to protect them from preemption. Only
> the accurate page stats that are updated by a read-modify-write need
> protection. This patch also differs in that a preempt_[en|dis]able_rt
> helper is not used. As vmstat is the only user of the helper, it was
> suggested that it be open-coded in vmstat.c instead of risking the helper
> being used in unnecessary contexts.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/vmstat.c
> +++ b/mm/vmstat.c
> @@ -319,6 +319,16 @@ void __mod_zone_page_state(struct zone *zone, enum zone_stat_item item,
>  	long x;
>  	long t;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Accurate vmstat updates require a RMW. On !PREEMPT_RT kernels,
> +	 * atomicity is provided by IRQs being disabled -- either explicitly
> +	 * or via local_lock_irq. On PREEMPT_RT, local_lock_irq only disables
> +	 * CPU migrations and preemption potentially corrupts a counter so
> +	 * disable preemption.
> +	 */
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
> +		preempt_disable();

This is so obvious I expect it has been discussed, but...  why not

static inline void preempt_disable_if_rt(void)
{
	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
		preempt_disable();
}

?