linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.14-rc4-rt5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <07fff459-375b-38ef-ec4d-647beb268731@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 5 Aug 2021 09:32:44 +0200
From:   Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
To:     Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.14-rc4-rt5

On 8/5/21 9:00 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 08:53:53AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 08:31:23AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>>> Just a heads up. I get these build errors:
>>
>> I suppose this should be:
> 
> and while at it, there are two more compile errors. The first one is
> obvious, the second one is just guessing.
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index c05a33a2f865..41e3d63160a7 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -1896,14 +1896,14 @@ static inline void futex_requeue_pi_complete(struct futex_q *q, int locked)
>                 if (locked >= 0) {
>                         /* Requeue succeeded. Set DONE or LOCKED */
>                         WARN_ON_ONCE(old != Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS &&
> -                                    old != Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT)
> +                                    old != Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT);
>                         new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE + locked;
>                 } else if (old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS) {
>                         /* Deadlock, no early wakeup interleave */
>                         new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE;
>                 } else {
>                         /* Deadlock, early wakeup interleave. */
> -                       WARN_ON_ONCE(old != Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_WAIT);
> +                       WARN_ON_ONCE(old != Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT);
>                         new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE;
>                 }
>         } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&q->requeue_state, &old, new));
> 

same problems, same fixes here.

-- Daniel