linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: db8500-prcmu: Handle missing FW variant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 5 Aug 2021 09:00:09 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: db8500-prcmu: Handle missing FW variant

On Thu, 05 Aug 2021, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 9:47 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Aug 2021, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >
> > > There was an "unknown" firmware variant turning up in the wild
> > > causing problems in the clock driver. Add this missing variant
> > > and clarify that varian 11 and 15 are Samsung variants, as this
> > > is now very well known from released products.
> > >
> > > Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
> > > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
> > > Cc: phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > > Clock maintainers: could you please ACK this so Lee can take
> > > this into the MFD tree? The chances of merge collisions are
> > > zero, this code changes very seldom.
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_of_clk.c | 3 ++-
> >
> > >  drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c       | 6 ++++--
> > >  include/linux/mfd/dbx500-prcmu.h | 3 ++-
> >
> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> 
> Actually I intended for the clock people to ACK it for you
> but since it is completely independent of 1/2 it actually works
> either way, maybe they will rather pick it up, who knows? :D

That's fine too.

I assume they will not require an immutable branch, as the turn-over
in this file is very low.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog