linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2] locking/atomic: arch/mips: Fix atomic{_64,}_sub_if

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210805091657.GF5979@alpha.franken.de>
Date:   Thu, 5 Aug 2021 11:16:57 +0200
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To:     Rui Wang <wangrui@...ngson.cn>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        Rui Wang <r@....cc>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] locking/atomic: arch/mips: Fix
 atomic{_64,}_sub_if_positive

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 05:31:52PM +0800, Rui Wang wrote:
> This looks like a typo and that caused atomic64 test failed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <wangrui@...ngson.cn>
> ---
>  arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

applied to mips-next with slightly edited subject.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]