linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] perf cs-etm: Save TRCDEVARCH register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210805094024.GA19058@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date:   Thu, 5 Aug 2021 17:40:24 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To:     James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc:     Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Coresight ML <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Al Grant <al.grant@....com>,
        "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] perf cs-etm: Save TRCDEVARCH register

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:34:36PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> 
> On 31/07/2021 07:37, Leo Yan wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
> >>> index 85168d87b2d7..65a863bdf5cc 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
> >>> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
> >>> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ static const char *metadata_etmv4_ro[CS_ETMV4_PRIV_MAX] = {
> >>>         [CS_ETMV4_TRCIDR2]              = "trcidr/trcidr2",
> >>>         [CS_ETMV4_TRCIDR8]              = "trcidr/trcidr8",
> >>>         [CS_ETMV4_TRCAUTHSTATUS]        = "mgmt/trcauthstatus",
> >>> +       [CS_ETE_TRCDEVARCH]             = "mgmt/trcdevarch"
> > ETMv4 supports TRCDEVARCH, so I think it's good to use the naming
> > "CS_ETMV4_TRCDEVARCH"?
> > 
> 
> Based on the other discussions do you still think I should do this?

No, don't need to add TRCDEVARCH for ETMv4 anymore.

> As part of the new magic number I moved it into a new enum so it
> might be clearer now?

Regard ETMv4 and ETE use the different decoder types from OpenCSD, you
could add a new magic number and new enum for ETE.  It would be easier
for later extension for ETMv4 and ETE separately if decoder requires
to pass more config info.

Thanks,
Leo