linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] firmware: arm_scmi: Free mailbox channels if probe fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 5 Aug 2021 11:54:27 +0100
From:   Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To:     Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     sudeep.holla@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avajid@...eaurora.org,
        adharmap@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] firmware: arm_scmi: Free mailbox channels if probe
 fails

On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 02:19:59PM -0700, Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote:
> Mailbox channels for the base protocol are setup during probe.
> There can be a scenario where probe fails to acquire the base
> protocol due to a timeout leading to cleaning up of all device
> managed memory including the scmi_mailbox structure setup during
> mailbox_chan_setup function.
> [   12.735104]arm-scmi soc:qcom,scmi: timed out in resp(caller: version_get+0x84/0x140)
> [   12.735224]arm-scmi soc:qcom,scmi: unable to communicate with SCMI
> [   12.735947]arm-scmi: probe of soc:qcom,scmi failed with error -110
> 
> Now when a message arrives at cpu slightly after the timeout, the mailbox
> controller will try to call the rx_callback of the client and might end
> up accessing freed memory.
> [   12.758363][    C0] Call trace:
> [   12.758367][    C0]  rx_callback+0x24/0x160
> [   12.758372][    C0]  mbox_chan_received_data+0x44/0x94
> [   12.758386][    C0]  __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xd4/0x240
> This patch frees the mailbox channels setup during probe and adds some more
> error handling in case the probe fails.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> index 9b2e8d4..ead3bd3 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> @@ -1390,6 +1390,21 @@ void scmi_protocol_device_unrequest(const struct scmi_device_id *id_table)
>  	mutex_unlock(&scmi_requested_devices_mtx);
>  }
>  

Hi,

> +static int scmi_cleanup_txrx_channels(struct scmi_info *info)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct idr *idr = &info->tx_idr;
> +
> +	ret = idr_for_each(idr, info->desc->ops->chan_free, idr);
> +	idr_destroy(&info->tx_idr);
> +
> +	idr = &info->rx_idr;
> +	ret = idr_for_each(idr, info->desc->ops->chan_free, idr);
> +	idr_destroy(&info->rx_idr);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> @@ -1430,7 +1445,7 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	ret = scmi_xfer_info_init(info);
>  	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto clear_txrx_setup;
>  
>  	if (scmi_notification_init(handle))
>  		dev_err(dev, "SCMI Notifications NOT available.\n");
> @@ -1443,7 +1458,7 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	ret = scmi_protocol_acquire(handle, SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "unable to communicate with SCMI\n");
> -		return ret;
> +		goto notification_exit;
>  	}
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&scmi_list_mutex);
> @@ -1482,6 +1497,12 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> +
> +notification_exit:
> +	scmi_notification_exit(&info->handle);
> +clear_txrx_setup:
> +	scmi_cleanup_txrx_channels(info);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  void scmi_free_channel(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct idr *idr, int id)
> @@ -1493,7 +1514,6 @@ static int scmi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	int ret = 0, id;
>  	struct scmi_info *info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> -	struct idr *idr = &info->tx_idr;
>  	struct device_node *child;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&scmi_list_mutex);
> @@ -1517,14 +1537,7 @@ static int scmi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	idr_destroy(&info->active_protocols);
>  
>  	/* Safe to free channels since no more users */
> -	ret = idr_for_each(idr, info->desc->ops->chan_free, idr);
> -	idr_destroy(&info->tx_idr);
> -
> -	idr = &info->rx_idr;
> -	ret = idr_for_each(idr, info->desc->ops->chan_free, idr);
> -	idr_destroy(&info->rx_idr);
> -
> -	return ret;
> +	return scmi_cleanup_txrx_channels(info);
>  }
>  

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
(Re-tested on for-next/scmi on top of virtio-scmi series)

Thanks,
Cristian