lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b03f9794-ff84-c869-0370-e8f13c577ed5@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Aug 2021 13:59:49 +0100
From:   James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@....com,
        mike.leach@...aro.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] perf cs-etm: Add warnings for missing DSOs



On 03/08/2021 15:01, Leo Yan wrote:
>> one can also use debuginfod-client, which, as time passes, probably will
>> be the main way of finding DSOs now that we have build-ids in
>> PERF_RECORD_MMAP2 and debuginfod servers such as:
>>
>> export DEBUGINFOD_URLS=https://debuginfod.fedoraproject.org/
> If so, maybe should use more general description for missing DSO.
> 
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Debuginfod
>>  
>>> With this improvement, the patch looks good to me:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
>> Does this apply to the other 5 patches in this series?
> I finished to reivew patches 01, 04, 05, 06/06, so my review tag can
> apply on these patches.  Current patch 06/06 needs James to improve for
> the comments.

Thanks for the reviews, I've submitted v2.

I also had a play around with debuginfod, it looks promising.
Especially if it's integrated with perf report, which I assume is the plan?

Thanks
James

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ