[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62eb8902-90fa-4b1a-55ce-a178643baf90@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 11:04:21 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: Chao Yu <chao.yu@...ux.dev>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [RFC v3] f2fs: extent cache: support unaligned extent
On 2021/8/5 10:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 08/05, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Jaegeuk,
>>
>> On 2021/8/5 7:45, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> Chao,
>>>
>>> How about this?
>>> https://github.com/jaegeuk/f2fs/commit/d6bbe121bc24dfabfedc07ba7cb6e921fb70ece0
>>
>> Looks more clean, thanks,
>>
>>>
>>> I'm digging one bug in __insert_extent_tree w/ the patch tho.
>>
>> Shouldn't we initialize @ei in f2fs_update_extent_tree_range(), otherwise,
>> __try_merge_extent_node(&ei) -> __is_extent_mergeable() will do the check
>> w/ uninitialized c_len of @ei.
>
> Fixed some bugs, but still getting another data corruption.
>
> https://github.com/jaegeuk/f2fs/commit/c5d97919c55b467392407b60c1a7b1e3e81721ff
Let me rebase to your code, and do some tests.
Thanks
>
>>
>>>> On 08/04, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>> + if (from_dnode)
>>>>> + goto skip_reading_dnode;
>>
>> Wrong condition here, thanks for fixing.
>>
>> Thanks,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists