[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c2bed36-1bcf-ae34-0e94-9110c7e2b242@synopsys.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 16:18:29 +0000
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
CC: "linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Vladimir Isaev <Vladimir.Isaev@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] ARC atomics update
On 8/5/21 2:02 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 12:15:43PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>
>> Vineet Gupta (10):
>> ARC: atomics: disintegrate header
>> ARC: atomic: !LLSC: remove hack in atomic_set() for for UP
>> ARC: atomic: !LLSC: use int data type consistently
>> ARC: atomic64: LLSC: elide unused atomic_{and,or,xor,andnot}_return
>> ARC: atomics: implement relaxed variants
>> ARC: bitops: fls/ffs to take int (vs long) per asm-generic defines
>> ARC: xchg: !LLSC: remove UP micro-optimization/hack
>> ARC: cmpxchg/xchg: rewrite as macros to make type safe
>> ARC: cmpxchg/xchg: implement relaxed variants (LLSC config only)
>> ARC: atomic_cmpxchg/atomic_xchg: implement relaxed variants
>>
>> Will Deacon (1):
>> ARC: switch to generic bitops
>
> Didn't see any weird things:
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Thx Peter. A lot of this is your code anyways ;-)
Any initial thoughts/comments on patch 06/11 - is there an obvious
reason that generic bitops take signed @nr or the hurdle is need to be
done consistently cross-arch.
-Vineet
Powered by blists - more mailing lists