[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210806023017.jtd3uk3p7fgupy4m@toshiba.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 11:30:17 +0900
From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, punit1.agrawal@...hiba.co.jp,
yuji2.ishikawa@...hiba.co.jp, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] PCI: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti PCIe host
controller driver
Hi,
Thank you for your review.
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 11:59:08AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 07:14:20AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> > Add support to PCIe RC controller on Toshiba Visconti ARM SoCs. PCIe
> > controller is based of Synopsys DesignWare PCIe core.
> >
> > This patch does not yet use the clock framework to control the clock.
> > This will be replaced in the future.
>
> This is not relevant information. I expect the commit log to describe
> the change and the reasons behind the choices.
OK, I will drop this sentence.
>
> Speaking of which, I'd like to understand what
>
> > This patch does not yet use the clock framework to control the clock.
>
> means and why it can't be done within this series.
Visconti5 has a clock control IP, but the driver for this is still under
development and has not been applied into mainline. Instead, the clock
for this driver is running using DT's fixed-clock. This will be
replaced by a clock driver.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Yuji Ishikawa <yuji2.ishikawa@...hiba.co.jp>
> > Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig | 9 +
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c | 333 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 343 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c
> >
<snip>
> > +
> > +static int
> > +visconti_add_pcie_port(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> Nit: don't split lines like this, it is better to keep return value
> type and function name in one single line.
>
> Do it like this:
>
> static int visconti_add_pcie_port(struct visconti_pcie *pcie,
> struct platform_device *pdev)
>
OK, I will fix in v6.
> Lorenzo
>
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists