[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210806023423.519560-1-dqfext@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 10:34:23 +0800
From: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mt7530: drop untagged frames on VLAN-aware ports without PVID
On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 03:17:40AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>
> Good catch with this condition, sja1105 and ocelot are buggy in this
> regard, it seems, probably others too. Need to fix them. Although
> honestly I would probably rather spend the time patching the bridge
> already to not accept duplicate VLAN entries from user space, just with
> different flags, it's just too complex to handle the overwrites everywhere...
> Plus, bridge accepting duplicate VLANs means we cannot refcount them on
> DSA and CPU ports at the cross-chip level, which in turn means we can
> never delete them from those ports.
>
> Anyhow, enough rambling.
>
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Please allow me to send a v2. This sets the CPU port's PVID to 0
on boot, which causes some undefined behaviour..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists