| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 14:21:22 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+66e110c312ed4ae684a8@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [syzbot] KASAN: use-after-free Read in timerfd_clock_was_set
On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 06:42:34PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Aug 02 2021 at 01:49, syzbot wrote:
> > syzbot found the following issue on:
> >
> > HEAD commit: 4010a528219e Merge tag 'fixes_for_v5.14-rc4' of git://git...
> > git tree: upstream
> > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13611f5c300000
> > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=1dee114394f7d2c2
> > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=66e110c312ed4ae684a8
> > compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.1
> >
> > Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
> >
> > IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> > Reported-by: syzbot+66e110c312ed4ae684a8@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> >
> > ==================================================================
> > BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in timerfd_clock_was_set+0x2b8/0x2e0
> > fs/timerfd.c:104
>
> 103 rcu_read_lock();
> 104 list_for_each_entry_rcu(ctx, &cancel_list, clist) {
>
> > timerfd_clock_was_set+0x2b8/0x2e0 fs/timerfd.c:104
> > timekeeping_inject_offset+0x4af/0x620 kernel/time/timekeeping.c:1375
> > do_adjtimex+0x28f/0xa30 kernel/time/timekeeping.c:2406
> > do_clock_adjtime kernel/time/posix-timers.c:1109 [inline]
> > __do_sys_clock_adjtime+0x163/0x270 kernel/time/posix-timers.c:1121
> > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> > do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
>
> ...
>
> > Allocated by task 1:
> > kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 mm/kasan/common.c:38
> > kasan_set_track mm/kasan/common.c:46 [inline]
> > set_alloc_info mm/kasan/common.c:434 [inline]
> > ____kasan_kmalloc mm/kasan/common.c:513 [inline]
> > ____kasan_kmalloc mm/kasan/common.c:472 [inline]
> > __kasan_kmalloc+0x98/0xc0 mm/kasan/common.c:522
> > kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:264 [inline]
> > kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1e4/0x480 mm/slab.c:3575
> > kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:591 [inline]
> > kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:721 [inline]
> > __do_sys_timerfd_create+0x265/0x370 fs/timerfd.c:412
> > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> > do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>
> ...
>
> > Freed by task 3306:
> > kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 mm/kasan/common.c:38
> > kasan_set_track+0x1c/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:46
> > kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x30 mm/kasan/generic.c:360
> > ____kasan_slab_free mm/kasan/common.c:366 [inline]
> > ____kasan_slab_free mm/kasan/common.c:328 [inline]
> > __kasan_slab_free+0xcd/0x100 mm/kasan/common.c:374
> > kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:230 [inline]
> > __cache_free mm/slab.c:3445 [inline]
> > kfree+0x106/0x2c0 mm/slab.c:3803
> > kvfree+0x42/0x50 mm/util.c:616
> > kfree_rcu_work+0x5b7/0x870 kernel/rcu/tree.c:3359
> > process_one_work+0x98d/0x1630 kernel/workqueue.c:2276
> > worker_thread+0x658/0x11f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2422
> > kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
> > ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
>
> So the free of the timerfd context happens while the context is
> still linked in the cancel list, which does not make sense because
>
> > Last potentially related work creation:
> > kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 mm/kasan/common.c:38
> > kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa4/0xd0 mm/kasan/generic.c:348
> > kvfree_call_rcu+0x74/0x990 kernel/rcu/tree.c:3594
> > timerfd_release+0x105/0x290 fs/timerfd.c:229
>
> timerfd_release() invokes timerfd_remove_cancel(context) before invoking
> kfree_rcu().
And the list being deleted from is the same list that is being scanned.
> > __fput+0x288/0x920 fs/file_table.c:280
> > task_work_run+0xdd/0x1a0 kernel/task_work.c:164
> > tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:189 [inline]
> > exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:175 [inline]
> > exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x27e/0x290 kernel/entry/common.c:209
> > __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:291 [inline]
> > syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x60 kernel/entry/common.c:302
> > do_syscall_64+0x42/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86
> > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>
> The only reason why timerfd_remove_cancel() would not remove it from the
> list is when context->might_cancel is false. But that would mean it's a
> memory corruption of some sort which went undetected. I can't spot
> anything in the timerfd code itself which would cause that.
>
> Confused.
You and me!
This kernel is built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y, so a stray schedule()
in the RCU read-side critical section would not cause this to happen
(as it might on a CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=n kernel). Besides, I am not seeing
any sign of a stray schedule() in that code.
This could of course be a too-short RCU grace period, but I have been
hammering RCU rather hard of late. No guarantee, of course, but...
This kernel is already built with CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS=y and also with
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=y, which is my usual suggestion in this
situation.
There are a bunch of "Directory bread(block 6) failed" messages before
this splat. Are those expected behavior, or might they be related?
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists