lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YQ2zH+XiLCLQWs0l@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Aug 2021 22:09:35 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc:     isaku.yamahata@...el.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, erdemaktas@...gle.com,
        Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
        Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 41/69] KVM: x86: Add infrastructure for stolen GPA
 bits

On Sat, Aug 07, 2021, Kai Huang wrote:
> So could we have your final suggestion? :)

Try the kvm_mmu_page_role.private approach.  So long as it doesn't end up splattering
code everywhere, I think that's more aligned with how KVM generally wants to treat
the shared bit.

In the changelog for this patch, make it very clear that ensuring different aliases
get different shadow page (if necessary) is the responsiblity of each individual
feature that leverages stolen gfn bits.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ