linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] soc: fsl: qe: convert QE interrupt controller to platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 5 Aug 2021 21:39:42 -0700
From:   Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To:     Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@...ox.ru>
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, qiang.zhao@....com,
        leoyang.li@....com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] soc: fsl: qe: convert QE interrupt controller to platform_device

On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 9:35 PM Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@...ox.ru> wrote:
>
> 03.08.2021 20:51, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> >> So lets convert this driver to simple platform_device with probe().
> >> Also use platform_get_ and devm_ family function to get/allocate
> >> resources and drop unused .compatible = "qeic".
> > Yes, please!
>
> Should I totally drop { .type = "qeic"}, or keep?

Sorry for the confusion. My "Yes, please"!" was a show of support for
switching this to a proper platform driver. Not a response to that
specific question.

I didn't look at the code/DT close enough to know/care about the "type" part.

-Saravana