[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <162820996886.19113.10627033259757713800@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 17:32:48 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] clk: Align provider-specific CLK_* bit definitions
Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2021-07-14 03:17:36)
> The definition of CLK_MULTIPLIER_ROUND_CLOSEST is not aligned to the two
> bit definitions next to it. A deeper inspection reveals that the
> alignment of CLK_MULTIPLIER_ROUND_CLOSEST does match the most common
> alignment.
>
> Align the bit definitions for the various provider types throughout the
> file at 40 columns, to increase uniformity.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> ---
Applied to clk-next
Powered by blists - more mailing lists