linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: db8500-prcmu: Handle missing FW variant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZfb4szcERUynqOaGrV5A1LbDSo-gSebW8dYmFE_=P6XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Aug 2021 10:14:40 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: db8500-prcmu: Handle missing FW variant

On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 1:51 AM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:

> > I assume they will not require an immutable branch, as the turn-over
> > in this file is very low.
>
> Seems fine to go through mfd. Isn't there some other ux500 patch on the
> list though?

Not for clocking, maybe more MFD stuff so merging to MFD should be
the best option.

Yours,
Linus Walleij