| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20210806081114.013548851@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 10:17:04 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 26/30] selftest/bpf: Adjust expected verifier errors
From: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@...il.com>
commit a680cb3d8e3f4f84205720b90c926579d04eedb6 upstream
The verifier errors around stack accesses have changed slightly in the
previous commit (generally for the better).
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210207011027.676572-3-andreimatei1@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_stack.c | 2 -
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c | 4 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/const_or.c | 4 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/helper_access_var_len.c | 12 +++---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/int_ptr.c | 6 +--
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_stack.c | 10 ++---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/stack_ptr.c | 22 ++++++-----
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c | 2 -
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c | 16 ++++----
9 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_stack.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_stack.c
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, 8, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .errstr = "invalid stack",
+ .errstr = "invalid write to stack",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
@@ -1228,7 +1228,7 @@
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 23 },
.result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "invalid read from stack off -16+0 size 8",
+ .errstr = "invalid read from stack R7 off=-16 size=8",
},
{
"calls: two calls that receive map_value via arg=ptr_stack_of_caller. test1",
@@ -1958,7 +1958,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 6 },
- .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack off -8+0 size 8",
+ .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack R2 off -8+0 size 8",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
},
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/const_or.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/const_or.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .errstr = "invalid stack type R1 off=-48 access_size=58",
+ .errstr = "invalid indirect access to stack R1 off=-48 size=58",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
},
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .errstr = "invalid stack type R1 off=-48 access_size=58",
+ .errstr = "invalid indirect access to stack R1 off=-48 size=58",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
},
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/helper_access_var_len.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/helper_access_var_len.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack off -64+0 size 64",
+ .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack R1 off -64+0 size 64",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
},
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .errstr = "invalid stack type R1 off=-64 access_size=65",
+ .errstr = "invalid indirect access to stack R1 off=-64 size=65",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
},
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .errstr = "invalid stack type R1 off=-64 access_size=65",
+ .errstr = "invalid indirect access to stack R1 off=-64 size=65",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
},
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .errstr = "invalid stack type R1 off=-64 access_size=65",
+ .errstr = "invalid indirect access to stack R1 off=-64 size=65",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
},
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack off -64+0 size 64",
+ .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack R1 off -64+0 size 64",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
},
@@ -584,7 +584,7 @@
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack off -64+32 size 64",
+ .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack R1 off -64+32 size 64",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
},
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/int_ptr.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/int_ptr.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
},
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SYSCTL,
- .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack off -16+0 size 8",
+ .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack R4 off -16+0 size 8",
},
{
"ARG_PTR_TO_LONG half-uninitialized",
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
},
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SYSCTL,
- .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack off -16+4 size 8",
+ .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack R4 off -16+4 size 8",
},
{
"ARG_PTR_TO_LONG misaligned",
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@
},
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SYSCTL,
- .errstr = "invalid stack type R4 off=-4 access_size=8",
+ .errstr = "invalid indirect access to stack R4 off=-4 size=8",
},
{
"ARG_PTR_TO_LONG initialized",
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_stack.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_stack.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "invalid read from stack off -8+0 size 8",
+ .errstr = "invalid read from stack R6 off=-8 size=8",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
{
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "invalid stack type R3",
+ .errstr = "invalid zero-sized read",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
{
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "invalid stack type R3 off=-513 access_size=8",
+ .errstr = "invalid indirect access to stack R3 off=-513 size=8",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
{
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "invalid stack type R3 off=-1 access_size=8",
+ .errstr = "invalid indirect access to stack R3 off=-1 size=8",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
{
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "invalid stack type R3 off=-512 access_size=0",
+ .errstr = "invalid zero-sized read",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
{
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/stack_ptr.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/stack_ptr.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "invalid stack off=-79992 size=8",
+ .errstr = "invalid write to stack R1 off=-79992 size=8",
.errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
},
{
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "invalid stack off=0 size=8",
+ .errstr = "invalid write to stack R1 off=0 size=8",
},
{
"PTR_TO_STACK check high 1",
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
- .errstr = "invalid stack off=0 size=1",
+ .errstr = "invalid write to stack R1 off=0 size=1",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -119,7 +119,8 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "invalid stack off",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
+ .errstr = "invalid write to stack R1",
},
{
"PTR_TO_STACK check high 6",
@@ -131,7 +132,8 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "invalid stack off",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
+ .errstr = "invalid write to stack",
},
{
"PTR_TO_STACK check high 7",
@@ -183,7 +185,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
- .errstr = "invalid stack off=-513 size=1",
+ .errstr = "invalid write to stack R1 off=-513 size=1",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -208,7 +210,8 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "invalid stack off",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
+ .errstr = "invalid write to stack",
},
{
"PTR_TO_STACK check low 6",
@@ -220,7 +223,8 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "invalid stack off",
+ .errstr = "invalid write to stack",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
},
{
"PTR_TO_STACK check low 7",
@@ -292,7 +296,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "invalid stack off=0 size=1",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "invalid write to stack R1 off=0 size=1",
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 42,
},
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
- .errstr_unpriv = "invalid indirect read from stack off -8+0 size 8",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "invalid indirect read from stack R2 off -8+0 size 8",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN,
},
{
- "variable-offset stack access",
+ "variable-offset stack read, priv vs unpriv",
.insns = {
/* Fill the top 8 bytes of the stack */
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .errstr = "R4 unbounded indirect variable offset stack access",
+ .errstr = "invalid unbounded variable-offset indirect access to stack R4",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS,
},
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 5 },
- .errstr = "R2 max value is outside of stack bound",
+ .errstr = "invalid variable-offset indirect access to stack R2",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN,
},
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 5 },
- .errstr = "R2 min value is outside of stack bound",
+ .errstr = "invalid variable-offset indirect access to stack R2",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN,
},
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 5 },
- .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack var_off",
+ .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack R2 var_off",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN,
},
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 5 },
- .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack var_off",
+ .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack R2 var_off",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN,
},
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 6 },
- .errstr_unpriv = "R2 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range, prohibited for !root",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R2 variable stack access prohibited for !root",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack var_off",
+ .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack R4 var_off",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS,
},
Powered by blists - more mailing lists