linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.13 21/35] qed: fix possible unpaired spin_{un}lock_bh in _qed_mcp_cmd_and

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210806081114.428051803@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri,  6 Aug 2021 10:17:04 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Lijian Zhang <Lijian.Zhang@....com>,
        Jia He <justin.he@....com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.13 21/35] qed: fix possible unpaired spin_{un}lock_bh in _qed_mcp_cmd_and_union()

From: Jia He <justin.he@....com>

[ Upstream commit 6206b7981a36476f4695d661ae139f7db36a802d ]

Liajian reported a bug_on hit on a ThunderX2 arm64 server with FastLinQ
QL41000 ethernet controller:
 BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/0:4/531/0x00000200
  [qed_probe:488()]hw prepare failed
  kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:2355!
  Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
  CPU: 0 PID: 531 Comm: kworker/0:4 Tainted: G W 5.4.0-77-generic #86-Ubuntu
  pstate: 00400009 (nzcv daif +PAN -UAO)
 Call trace:
  vunmap+0x4c/0x50
  iounmap+0x48/0x58
  qed_free_pci+0x60/0x80 [qed]
  qed_probe+0x35c/0x688 [qed]
  __qede_probe+0x88/0x5c8 [qede]
  qede_probe+0x60/0xe0 [qede]
  local_pci_probe+0x48/0xa0
  work_for_cpu_fn+0x24/0x38
  process_one_work+0x1d0/0x468
  worker_thread+0x238/0x4e0
  kthread+0xf0/0x118
  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18

In this case, qed_hw_prepare() returns error due to hw/fw error, but in
theory work queue should be in process context instead of interrupt.

The root cause might be the unpaired spin_{un}lock_bh() in
_qed_mcp_cmd_and_union(), which causes botton half is disabled incorrectly.

Reported-by: Lijian Zhang <Lijian.Zhang@....com>
Signed-off-by: Jia He <justin.he@....com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_mcp.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_mcp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_mcp.c
index cd882c453394..caeef25c89bb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_mcp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_mcp.c
@@ -474,14 +474,18 @@ _qed_mcp_cmd_and_union(struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn,
 
 		spin_lock_bh(&p_hwfn->mcp_info->cmd_lock);
 
-		if (!qed_mcp_has_pending_cmd(p_hwfn))
+		if (!qed_mcp_has_pending_cmd(p_hwfn)) {
+			spin_unlock_bh(&p_hwfn->mcp_info->cmd_lock);
 			break;
+		}
 
 		rc = qed_mcp_update_pending_cmd(p_hwfn, p_ptt);
-		if (!rc)
+		if (!rc) {
+			spin_unlock_bh(&p_hwfn->mcp_info->cmd_lock);
 			break;
-		else if (rc != -EAGAIN)
+		} else if (rc != -EAGAIN) {
 			goto err;
+		}
 
 		spin_unlock_bh(&p_hwfn->mcp_info->cmd_lock);
 
@@ -498,6 +502,8 @@ _qed_mcp_cmd_and_union(struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn,
 		return -EAGAIN;
 	}
 
+	spin_lock_bh(&p_hwfn->mcp_info->cmd_lock);
+
 	/* Send the mailbox command */
 	qed_mcp_reread_offsets(p_hwfn, p_ptt);
 	seq_num = ++p_hwfn->mcp_info->drv_mb_seq;
@@ -524,14 +530,18 @@ _qed_mcp_cmd_and_union(struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn,
 
 		spin_lock_bh(&p_hwfn->mcp_info->cmd_lock);
 
-		if (p_cmd_elem->b_is_completed)
+		if (p_cmd_elem->b_is_completed) {
+			spin_unlock_bh(&p_hwfn->mcp_info->cmd_lock);
 			break;
+		}
 
 		rc = qed_mcp_update_pending_cmd(p_hwfn, p_ptt);
-		if (!rc)
+		if (!rc) {
+			spin_unlock_bh(&p_hwfn->mcp_info->cmd_lock);
 			break;
-		else if (rc != -EAGAIN)
+		} else if (rc != -EAGAIN) {
 			goto err;
+		}
 
 		spin_unlock_bh(&p_hwfn->mcp_info->cmd_lock);
 	} while (++cnt < max_retries);
@@ -554,6 +564,7 @@ _qed_mcp_cmd_and_union(struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn,
 		return -EAGAIN;
 	}
 
+	spin_lock_bh(&p_hwfn->mcp_info->cmd_lock);
 	qed_mcp_cmd_del_elem(p_hwfn, p_cmd_elem);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&p_hwfn->mcp_info->cmd_lock);
 
-- 
2.30.2