[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210806004751.GU26252@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:47:51 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: "quanyang.wang" <quanyang.wang@...driver.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Naga Sureshkumar Relli <naga.sureshkumar.relli@...inx.com>,
Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@...inx.com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-zynq-qspi: use wait_for_completion_timeout to
make zynq_qspi_exec_mem_op not interruptible
On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 08:41:41AM +0800, quanyang.wang wrote:
> ping.
Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
for the subsystem are normally handled.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists