[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210806133802.3528-5-lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 21:37:48 +0800
From: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, pbonzini@...hat.com
Cc: bp@...en8.de, seanjc@...gle.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
wanpengli@...cent.com, jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org,
kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
wei.w.wang@...el.com, eranian@...gle.com, liuxiangdong5@...wei.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
like.xu.linux@...il.com, boris.ostrvsky@...cle.com,
Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH V10 04/18] perf/x86/core: Pass "struct kvm_pmu *" to determine the guest values
From: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
Splitting the logic for determining the guest values is unnecessarily
confusing, and potentially fragile. Perf should have full knowledge and
control of what values are loaded for the guest.
If we change .guest_get_msrs() to take a struct kvm_pmu pointer, then it
can generate the full set of guest values by grabbing guest ds_area and
pebs_data_cfg. Alternatively, .guest_get_msrs() could take the desired
guest MSR values directly (ds_area and pebs_data_cfg), but kvm_pmu is
vendor agnostic, so we don't see any reason to not just pass the pointer.
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
arch/x86/events/core.c | 4 ++--
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 4 ++--
arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 4 ++--
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 3 ++-
5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 2240480cef6f..ae2ffe37bfbb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -713,9 +713,9 @@ void x86_pmu_disable_all(void)
}
}
-struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
+struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr, void *data)
{
- return static_call(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs)(nr);
+ return static_call(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs)(nr, data);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_guest_get_msrs);
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 2770eba232c7..e09cc8901524 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3899,7 +3899,7 @@ static int intel_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
return 0;
}
-static struct perf_guest_switch_msr *intel_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
+static struct perf_guest_switch_msr *intel_guest_get_msrs(int *nr, void *data)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
struct perf_guest_switch_msr *arr = cpuc->guest_switch_msrs;
@@ -3932,7 +3932,7 @@ static struct perf_guest_switch_msr *intel_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
return arr;
}
-static struct perf_guest_switch_msr *core_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
+static struct perf_guest_switch_msr *core_guest_get_msrs(int *nr, void *data)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
struct perf_guest_switch_msr *arr = cpuc->guest_switch_msrs;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 68601de166a3..1518f2754842 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
/*
* Intel host/guest support (KVM)
*/
- struct perf_guest_switch_msr *(*guest_get_msrs)(int *nr);
+ struct perf_guest_switch_msr *(*guest_get_msrs)(int *nr, void *data);
/*
* Check period value for PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD ioctl.
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 42d7bcf1a896..bf61beaa7906 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -492,10 +492,10 @@ static inline void perf_check_microcode(void) { }
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) && defined(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL)
-extern struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr);
+extern struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr, void *data);
extern int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr);
#else
-struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr);
+struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr, void *data);
static inline int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr)
{
return -1;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 927a552393b9..063e869b4e19 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -6512,9 +6512,10 @@ static void atomic_switch_perf_msrs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
{
int i, nr_msrs;
struct perf_guest_switch_msr *msrs;
+ struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(&vmx->vcpu);
/* Note, nr_msrs may be garbage if perf_guest_get_msrs() returns NULL. */
- msrs = perf_guest_get_msrs(&nr_msrs);
+ msrs = perf_guest_get_msrs(&nr_msrs, (void *)pmu);
if (!msrs)
return;
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists