| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20210806145408.204471233@goodmis.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 10:53:02 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: [for-linus][PATCH 3/3] tracepoint: Use rcu get state and cond sync for static call updates
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
State transitions from 1->0->1 and N->2->1 callbacks require RCU
synchronization. Rather than performing the RCU synchronization every
time the state change occurs, which is quite slow when many tracepoints
are registered in batch, instead keep a snapshot of the RCU state on the
most recent transitions which belong to a chain, and conditionally wait
for a grace period on the last transition of the chain if one g.p. has
not elapsed since the last snapshot.
This applies to both RCU and SRCU.
This brings the performance regression caused by commit 231264d6927f
("Fix: tracepoint: static call function vs data state mismatch") back to
what it was originally.
Before this commit:
# trace-cmd start -e all
# time trace-cmd start -p nop
real 0m10.593s
user 0m0.017s
sys 0m0.259s
After this commit:
# trace-cmd start -e all
# time trace-cmd start -p nop
real 0m0.878s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.103s
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210805192954.30688-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/4ebea8f0-58c9-e571-fd30-0ce4f6f09c70@samba.org/
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 5.10+
Fixes: 231264d6927f ("Fix: tracepoint: static call function vs data state mismatch")
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
kernel/tracepoint.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c
index 8d772bd6894d..efd14c79fab4 100644
--- a/kernel/tracepoint.c
+++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c
@@ -28,6 +28,44 @@ extern tracepoint_ptr_t __stop___tracepoints_ptrs[];
DEFINE_SRCU(tracepoint_srcu);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tracepoint_srcu);
+enum tp_transition_sync {
+ TP_TRANSITION_SYNC_1_0_1,
+ TP_TRANSITION_SYNC_N_2_1,
+
+ _NR_TP_TRANSITION_SYNC,
+};
+
+struct tp_transition_snapshot {
+ unsigned long rcu;
+ unsigned long srcu;
+ bool ongoing;
+};
+
+/* Protected by tracepoints_mutex */
+static struct tp_transition_snapshot tp_transition_snapshot[_NR_TP_TRANSITION_SYNC];
+
+static void tp_rcu_get_state(enum tp_transition_sync sync)
+{
+ struct tp_transition_snapshot *snapshot = &tp_transition_snapshot[sync];
+
+ /* Keep the latest get_state snapshot. */
+ snapshot->rcu = get_state_synchronize_rcu();
+ snapshot->srcu = start_poll_synchronize_srcu(&tracepoint_srcu);
+ snapshot->ongoing = true;
+}
+
+static void tp_rcu_cond_sync(enum tp_transition_sync sync)
+{
+ struct tp_transition_snapshot *snapshot = &tp_transition_snapshot[sync];
+
+ if (!snapshot->ongoing)
+ return;
+ cond_synchronize_rcu(snapshot->rcu);
+ if (!poll_state_synchronize_srcu(&tracepoint_srcu, snapshot->srcu))
+ synchronize_srcu(&tracepoint_srcu);
+ snapshot->ongoing = false;
+}
+
/* Set to 1 to enable tracepoint debug output */
static const int tracepoint_debug;
@@ -311,6 +349,11 @@ static int tracepoint_add_func(struct tracepoint *tp,
*/
switch (nr_func_state(tp_funcs)) {
case TP_FUNC_1: /* 0->1 */
+ /*
+ * Make sure new static func never uses old data after a
+ * 1->0->1 transition sequence.
+ */
+ tp_rcu_cond_sync(TP_TRANSITION_SYNC_1_0_1);
/* Set static call to first function */
tracepoint_update_call(tp, tp_funcs);
/* Both iterator and static call handle NULL tp->funcs */
@@ -325,10 +368,15 @@ static int tracepoint_add_func(struct tracepoint *tp,
* Requires ordering between RCU assign/dereference and
* static call update/call.
*/
- rcu_assign_pointer(tp->funcs, tp_funcs);
- break;
+ fallthrough;
case TP_FUNC_N: /* N->N+1 (N>1) */
rcu_assign_pointer(tp->funcs, tp_funcs);
+ /*
+ * Make sure static func never uses incorrect data after a
+ * N->...->2->1 (N>1) transition sequence.
+ */
+ if (tp_funcs[0].data != old[0].data)
+ tp_rcu_get_state(TP_TRANSITION_SYNC_N_2_1);
break;
default:
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
@@ -372,24 +420,23 @@ static int tracepoint_remove_func(struct tracepoint *tp,
/* Both iterator and static call handle NULL tp->funcs */
rcu_assign_pointer(tp->funcs, NULL);
/*
- * Make sure new func never uses old data after a 1->0->1
- * transition sequence.
- * Considering that transition 0->1 is the common case
- * and don't have rcu-sync, issue rcu-sync after
- * transition 1->0 to break that sequence by waiting for
- * readers to be quiescent.
+ * Make sure new static func never uses old data after a
+ * 1->0->1 transition sequence.
*/
- tracepoint_synchronize_unregister();
+ tp_rcu_get_state(TP_TRANSITION_SYNC_1_0_1);
break;
case TP_FUNC_1: /* 2->1 */
rcu_assign_pointer(tp->funcs, tp_funcs);
/*
- * On 2->1 transition, RCU sync is needed before setting
- * static call to first callback, because the observer
- * may have loaded any prior tp->funcs after the last one
- * associated with an rcu-sync.
+ * Make sure static func never uses incorrect data after a
+ * N->...->2->1 (N>2) transition sequence. If the first
+ * element's data has changed, then force the synchronization
+ * to prevent current readers that have loaded the old data
+ * from calling the new function.
*/
- tracepoint_synchronize_unregister();
+ if (tp_funcs[0].data != old[0].data)
+ tp_rcu_get_state(TP_TRANSITION_SYNC_N_2_1);
+ tp_rcu_cond_sync(TP_TRANSITION_SYNC_N_2_1);
/* Set static call to first function */
tracepoint_update_call(tp, tp_funcs);
break;
@@ -397,6 +444,12 @@ static int tracepoint_remove_func(struct tracepoint *tp,
fallthrough;
case TP_FUNC_N:
rcu_assign_pointer(tp->funcs, tp_funcs);
+ /*
+ * Make sure static func never uses incorrect data after a
+ * N->...->2->1 (N>2) transition sequence.
+ */
+ if (tp_funcs[0].data != old[0].data)
+ tp_rcu_get_state(TP_TRANSITION_SYNC_N_2_1);
break;
default:
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists