linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] dmaengine: acpi: Check for errors from acpi_register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 Aug 2021 21:49:34 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] dmaengine: acpi: Check for errors from
 acpi_register_gsi() separately

On 06-08-21, 18:29, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 07:14:50PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 02-08-21, 20:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > While IRQ test agaist the returned variable in practice is a good enough
> > > there is still a room for theoretical mistake in case the vIRQ of the
> > > device contains the same error code that acpi_register_gsi() may return.
> > > Due to this, check for error code separately from matching the vIRQs.
> > > 
> > > Besides that, append documentation to tell why acpi_gsi_to_irq() can't
> > > be used and we call acpi_register_gsi() instead.
> > 
> > patch fails to apply, pls rebase
> 
> I don't see that you applied the previous patch [1].
> Care to apply it, please?

Sorry, somehow that one was pushed to queue but never got applied!

Have applied both now

> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20210730202715.24375-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/T/#u
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 

-- 
~Vinod