linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 4/5] spmi: mediatek: Add support for MT8195

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 06 Aug 2021 10:49:19 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
        Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 4/5] spmi: mediatek: Add support for MT8195

Quoting Hsin-Hsiung Wang (2021-08-02 23:34:20)
> From: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>
> 
> Add spmi support for MT8195.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>

Missing Signed-off-by from hsin-hsiung.wang here

> ---
> changes since v9:
> - No change.
> ---
>  drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
> index 94c45d46ab0c..0c320801c9d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
> +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
> @@ -348,6 +427,14 @@ static const struct pmif_data mt6873_pmif_arb = {
>         .soc_chan = 2,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct pmif_data mt8195_pmif_arb[] = {

This is an array of type pmif_data.

> +       {
> +               .regs = mt8195_regs,
> +               .spmimst_regs = mt8195_spmi_regs,
> +               .soc_chan = 2,
> +       },
> +};
> +
>  static int mtk_spmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>         struct pmif *arb;
> @@ -444,6 +531,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id mtk_spmi_match_table[] = {
>         {
>                 .compatible = "mediatek,mt6873-spmi",
>                 .data = &mt6873_pmif_arb,

mt6873_pmif_arb is not an array, see the context header above.

How does this work? Has this been tested?

> +       }, {
> +               .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-spmi",
> +               .data = &mt8195_pmif_arb,
>         }, {
>                 /* sentinel */
>         },
> -- 
> 2.18.0
>