linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.13 32/35] Revert "spi: mediatek: fix fifo rx mode"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YQ5Ca/SouyQy9sSB@kroah.com>
Date:   Sat, 7 Aug 2021 10:20:59 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Hess <peter.hess@...home.de>,
        Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.13 32/35] Revert "spi: mediatek: fix fifo rx mode"

On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 11:54:08AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 8/6/21 1:17 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > 
> > This reverts commit 09b8cc7810587257e5f82080884001301e1a1ba9 which is
> > commit 3a70dd2d050331ee4cf5ad9d5c0a32d83ead9a43 upstream.
> > 
> > It has been found to have problems.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> > Cc: Peter Hess <peter.hess@...home.de>
> > Cc: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
> > Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/efee3a58-a4d2-af22-0931-e81b877ab539@roeck-us.net
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> 
> The problem with the reverted patch has now been fixed in the mainline
> kernel with commit 0d5c3954b35e ("spi: mediatek: Fix fifo transfer").
> So an alternative to this revert might be to apply commit 0d5c3954b35e
> instead.

Good idea, I'll go drop this revert and add that change instead.

thanks,

greg k-h