[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210807032521.7591-3-peterx@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 23:25:19 -0400
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Tiberiu Georgescu <tiberiu.georgescu@...anix.com>,
ivan.teterevkov@...anix.com,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, peterx@...hat.com,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 2/4] mm: Check against orig_pte for finish_fault()
We used to check against none pte and in those cases orig_pte should always be
none pte anyway.
This change prepares us to be able to call do_fault() on !none ptes. For
example, we should allow that to happen for pte marker that has PAGEOUT set.
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
---
mm/memory.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 25fc46e87214..7288f585544a 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -4047,7 +4047,7 @@ vm_fault_t finish_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
ret = 0;
/* Re-check under ptl */
- if (likely(pte_none(*vmf->pte)))
+ if (likely(pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte)))
do_set_pte(vmf, page, vmf->address);
else
ret = VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists